Comp Committee Memo Builder
Assemble the pre-read from the workbench tools you already ran.
The meta-tool. Paste the markdown summaries from Refresh Sizing, Plan Health, Grant Distribution, Underwater Options, Plan Amendment, ASC 718, and the rest, add key metrics, risks, open questions, and recommended next steps, and assemble a deterministic board-format pre-read with executive summary, decision requested, and disclaimer.
Deterministic templating. No AI in the path. Client-side only. Memo assembly tool, not legal, accounting, or financial advice. The plan document, comp committee charter, and qualified counsel control any committee action.
How to use this in a meeting cycle
Step 1
Set the meeting context
Meeting date, company stage, topic, requested action (inform / discuss / approve).
Step 2
Paste analysis sections
Drop in the markdown summaries from the workbench tools (refresh sizing, plan health, ASC 718, etc.). Each summary becomes a sub-section under Analysis.
Step 3
Add key metrics
A short table that reads at a glance. Three to seven rows is the right size for a board pre-read.
Step 4
Capture risks + questions + steps
Risks (with severity), open questions (with owner), recommended next steps (with owner + due). The committee uses these to drive the conversation.
Step 5
Export
Copy the markdown into your secretary template, or download the .md and convert to PDF / Google Doc.
What this tool is, and what it isn’t
Memo assembly only
Deterministic markdown template. The user supplies every word; the tool only orders the sections, escapes table cells, and renders the headers and disclaimer.
Not legal advice
Comp committee charters, plan documents, listing rules, and securities law control any actual board action. The tool is a faster pre-read, not a replacement for the company secretary or counsel.
No AI in the path
The memo body is concatenated from your inputs. No LLM rewrites; nothing leaves the browser tab.
Pairs with the rest of the workbench
Paste the markdown memos from Refresh Sizing, Plan Health, ASC 718, Plan Amendment, etc. as analysis sections. The committee gets the underlying math + the assembled committee narrative in one place.
Meeting context
Executive summary (optional)
Analysis sections
Paste markdown summaries from the underlying workbench tools. Each section keeps its heading and body verbatim.
Key metrics
3–7 rows reads cleanly in a pre-read.
Risks
Open questions
Recommended next steps
Memo preview
Plain markdown. Drop into your secretary template, paste into Google Docs / Notion, or save as .md for conversion to PDF.
# Sample Inc. — FY26 refresh recommendation **Meeting date:** 2026-06-15 **Stage:** Public **Topic:** Refresh grant cycle **Requested action:** For approval Memo assembled from typed and pasted inputs. Not legal, accounting, or financial advice. The plan document, comp committee charter, and qualified counsel control any committee action. ## 1. Executive summary FY26 refresh sized to land within budget with no broad-based deviation from the framework. One above-band override remains without documented rationale; the committee is asked to approve subject to that gap being closed. ## 2. Decision requested - For approval. - Headline ask: Approve the FY26 refresh distribution and authorize the CHRO to execute under the plan. ## 3. Key metrics | Metric | Value | | --- | --- | | Total proposed dollars | $25.0M | | Budget | $26.5M | | Headcount in scope | 800 | | Above-band overrides | 12 | | Average per employee | $31,250 | ## 4. Analysis ### Refresh sizing summary - Population: 800 employees - Total proposed: $25.0M - Budget: $26.5M (94% utilization) - Above-band overrides: 12 (rationale documented for 11 of 12) - Below-band overrides: 0 ### Performance distribution - Top: 8% of headcount, 14% of dollars - High: 22%, 28% - Meets: 60%, 53% - Emerging / Below: 10%, 5% ## 5. Risks and open questions **Risks:** | Severity | Risk | Detail | | --- | --- | --- | | Medium | Outlier overrides without rationale | 1 of 12 above-band overrides lacks a documented rationale. | | Low | Stale FMV reference | FMV used in the model is 32 days old; refresh date is 14 days out. | **Open questions:** - Confirm L7 retention guideline change is reflected in plan-doc language. (owner: Legal) - Confirm the additional ASC 718 expense impact lands inside the FY26 expense plan. (owner: Accounting) ## 6. Recommended next steps 1. Approve the FY26 refresh distribution and authorize the CHRO to execute under the plan (owner: Comp committee) — due 2026-06-15. 2. Reconcile the additional ASC 718 expense in the next earnings cycle (owner: Accounting). 3. Update the L7 plan-doc retention guideline language (owner: Legal) — due 2026-07-31. ## Disclaimer Memo assembled from typed and pasted inputs. Not legal, accounting, or financial advice. The plan document, comp committee charter, listing-rule restrictions, ASC 718 accounting policy, and qualified counsel control any committee action.
Memo assembly tool. Not legal, accounting, or financial advice. The plan document, comp committee charter, listing-rule restrictions, ASC 718 accounting policy, and qualified counsel control any committee action.